Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The case pertains to revocation of cancelled GST registration due to non-filing of returns for a continuous period exceeding twelve months. The petitioner cited the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for not conducting business during that period. The High Court referred to the Suguna Cutpiece case, where GST registration was restored subject to certain terms and conditions. Following the precedent, the court directed restoration of the petitioner's GST registration, contingent upon fulfilling the stipulated conditions. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
The case pertains to revocation of cancelled GST registration due to non-filing of returns for a continuous period exceeding twelve months. The petitioner cited the resurgence of the COVID-19 pandemic as the reason for not conducting business during that period. The High Court referred to the Suguna Cutpiece case, where GST registration was restored subject to certain terms and conditions. Following the precedent, the court directed restoration of the petitioner's GST registration, contingent upon fulfilling the stipulated conditions. The petition was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
