Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The High Court examined whether payments made by an Indian company to its associated entity in the US for supply of computer software constituted "royalty" under the Income Tax Act and the India-US DTAA. The court held that the tax authority failed to consider the assessee's submissions that such payments did not constitute royalty, merely relying on a draft assessment order which is not a final determination. Citing precedents, the court ruled that for payments to qualify as royalty, there must be a transfer of copyright enabling acts under the Copyright Act. Mere right to use software without any proprietary rights does not amount to royalty. The court quashed the orders denying nil withholding certificates and directed fresh examination.
The High Court examined whether payments made by an Indian company to its associated entity in the US for supply of computer software constituted "royalty" under the Income Tax Act and the India-US DTAA. The court held that the tax authority failed to consider the assessee's submissions that such payments did not constitute royalty, merely relying on a draft assessment order which is not a final determination. Citing precedents, the court ruled that for payments to qualify as royalty, there must be a transfer of copyright enabling acts under the Copyright Act. Mere right to use software without any proprietary rights does not amount to royalty. The court quashed the orders denying nil withholding certificates and directed fresh examination.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
