Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The assessment year in question falls beyond the stipulated six assessment years and four relevant assessment years, rendering the notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 153C of the Act, dated 31.12.2021, and the consequent assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 153C, dated 31.03.2022, barred by limitation. Following the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs Jasjit Singh, for the purpose of the proviso to Section 153C(1) of the Act, in the case of such other person, the reference to the date of initiation of search u/s 132 of the Act in the second proviso to Section 153A(1) shall be construed as the date of receiving the books of accounts or other documents by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person, which is considered as 31.12.2021 in the present case. Consequently, the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with Section 153C, dated 31.03.2022, is quashed, and the decision is in favor of the assessee.
The assessment year in question falls beyond the stipulated six assessment years and four relevant assessment years, rendering the notice issued by the Assessing Officer u/s 153C of the Act, dated 31.12.2021, and the consequent assessment order passed u/s 143(3) read with Section 153C, dated 31.03.2022, barred by limitation. Following the decision of the Honorable Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs Jasjit Singh, for the purpose of the proviso to Section 153C(1) of the Act, in the case of such other person, the reference to the date of initiation of search u/s 132 of the Act in the second proviso to Section 153A(1) shall be construed as the date of receiving the books of accounts or other documents by the Assessing Officer having jurisdiction over such other person, which is considered as 31.12.2021 in the present case. Consequently, the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 143(3) read with Section 153C, dated 31.03.2022, is quashed, and the decision is in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
