Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Non-forwarding of bills by user departments for scrutiny and delay in uploading soft copies led to rejection of discharge application. However, the material presented by CBI fell short of substantiating the accusations against the petitioners. Absence of prosecution against public servants raised doubts about CBI's ability to prosecute petitioners, as per the Delhi High Court's ruling that dropping charges against the main public servant precludes charges of abetment. No grave suspicion was established based on available evidence. Continuing prosecution would be an abuse of legal process with no chance of conviction. The High Court set aside the lower court's order and discharged the petitioners.
Non-forwarding of bills by user departments for scrutiny and delay in uploading soft copies led to rejection of discharge application. However, the material presented by CBI fell short of substantiating the accusations against the petitioners. Absence of prosecution against public servants raised doubts about CBI's ability to prosecute petitioners, as per the Delhi High Court's ruling that dropping charges against the main public servant precludes charges of abetment. No grave suspicion was established based on available evidence. Continuing prosecution would be an abuse of legal process with no chance of conviction. The High Court set aside the lower court's order and discharged the petitioners.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
