Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The court held that goods should be provisionally released 'back to town' upon the petitioner submitting a bond, solvency certificate, and an undertaking from the director to remain present when summoned. The respondent's reliance on a Board Circular requiring a bank guarantee or cash security was set aside, as Section 110A only allows for a bond with conditions determined by the adjudicating authority in case of seizure, which did not occur here. The impugned communication insisting on security was quashed, and the respondent was directed to release the goods within two weeks upon compliance with the specified conditions by the petitioner. The court found no justification for the continued detention of goods and the accrual of charges.
The court held that goods should be provisionally released 'back to town' upon the petitioner submitting a bond, solvency certificate, and an undertaking from the director to remain present when summoned. The respondent's reliance on a Board Circular requiring a bank guarantee or cash security was set aside, as Section 110A only allows for a bond with conditions determined by the adjudicating authority in case of seizure, which did not occur here. The impugned communication insisting on security was quashed, and the respondent was directed to release the goods within two weeks upon compliance with the specified conditions by the petitioner. The court found no justification for the continued detention of goods and the accrual of charges.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
