Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Proviso to Section 45(1) of PMLA permits certain categories of accused, including women, to be released on bail without satisfying twin requirements u/s 45. While woman accused may not automatically be entitled to benefit, court must provide specific reasons for denying such benefit. Single judge erroneously observed proviso applicable only to "vulnerable woman", contrary to Supreme Court's observation that courts need to be sensitive and sympathetic towards categories included in proviso, who may be misused by unscrupulous elements. Single judge misdirected herself in denying proviso benefit. Impugned judgment quashed, appeal allowed.
Proviso to Section 45(1) of PMLA permits certain categories of accused, including women, to be released on bail without satisfying twin requirements u/s 45. While woman accused may not automatically be entitled to benefit, court must provide specific reasons for denying such benefit. Single judge erroneously observed proviso applicable only to "vulnerable woman", contrary to Supreme Court's observation that courts need to be sensitive and sympathetic towards categories included in proviso, who may be misused by unscrupulous elements. Single judge misdirected herself in denying proviso benefit. Impugned judgment quashed, appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.