Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The court dismissed the third bail application filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in a case involving money laundering and illegal extortion on coal transportation. The offences were punishable u/ss 3 & 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The court observed that the Enforcement Directorate had collected sufficient prima facie evidence to conclude that the applicant, a former Deputy Secretary and OSD in the Chief Minister's Office, was actively involved in money laundering u/s 3 of PMLA. The court found no grounds to satisfy that the applicant was not guilty or to grant the special benefit under the proviso to Section 45 of PMLA. The delay in trial was due to the non-cooperation of other accused and not without reason. Considering the applicant had remained in custody for only 1 year and 8 months and failed to fulfill the twin conditions for bail under PMLA, the court rejected the third bail application.
The court dismissed the third bail application filed u/s 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in a case involving money laundering and illegal extortion on coal transportation. The offences were punishable u/ss 3 & 4 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002. The court observed that the Enforcement Directorate had collected sufficient prima facie evidence to conclude that the applicant, a former Deputy Secretary and OSD in the Chief Minister's Office, was actively involved in money laundering u/s 3 of PMLA. The court found no grounds to satisfy that the applicant was not guilty or to grant the special benefit under the proviso to Section 45 of PMLA. The delay in trial was due to the non-cooperation of other accused and not without reason. Considering the applicant had remained in custody for only 1 year and 8 months and failed to fulfill the twin conditions for bail under PMLA, the court rejected the third bail application.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
