Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cargo handling service or manpower supply service was the central issue. The demand raised for service tax on 'cargo handling service' was held unsustainable as the appellant merely supplied manpower for loading cement, not classifiable as 'cargo handling service' based on Tribunal's earlier decision. The demand for service tax on 'construction service' was also held unsustainable as the adjudicating authority failed to specify the taxable category. Consequently, interest and penalties u/ss 77(1)(a), 77(1)(b), 77(1)(c) of Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 7C of Service Tax Rules, 1994 for non-registration and non-filing of returns were set aside. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order.
Cargo handling service or manpower supply service was the central issue. The demand raised for service tax on 'cargo handling service' was held unsustainable as the appellant merely supplied manpower for loading cement, not classifiable as 'cargo handling service' based on Tribunal's earlier decision. The demand for service tax on 'construction service' was also held unsustainable as the adjudicating authority failed to specify the taxable category. Consequently, interest and penalties u/ss 77(1)(a), 77(1)(b), 77(1)(c) of Finance Act, 1994 and Rule 7C of Service Tax Rules, 1994 for non-registration and non-filing of returns were set aside. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
