Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court adjudicated a matter concerning refund of an amount deposited under compulsion and provisional attachment of bank accounts. The court refrained from issuing directions for refund, clarifying that the petitioners could apply for refund in accordance with law without awaiting adjudication of the show cause notice. Regarding seized articles and documents, the respondent stated that all hard disks and other articles were returned, except two laptops which were stolen, with an FIR lodged for the same. The petition was consequently disposed of.
The High Court adjudicated a matter concerning refund of an amount deposited under compulsion and provisional attachment of bank accounts. The court refrained from issuing directions for refund, clarifying that the petitioners could apply for refund in accordance with law without awaiting adjudication of the show cause notice. Regarding seized articles and documents, the respondent stated that all hard disks and other articles were returned, except two laptops which were stolen, with an FIR lodged for the same. The petition was consequently disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
