Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank...
Petitioner seeks release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized electronic devices & refund of Rs. 22 lakh after search & seizure raid.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized laptops, CPUs, mobile phones and documents, and refund of Rs. 22 lakh allegedly deposited during search and seizure raid. Commissioner justified freezing bank accounts through speaking order. Regarding seized devices, Commissioner directed to examine retaining them beyond 30 days as per Section 67(3) of CGST Act and ensure data access to petitioner. Counter-affidavit by respondents on refund claim not on record, to be filed before next hearing on 20.08.2024. Matter listed accordingly.
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized laptops, CPUs, mobile phones and documents, and refund of Rs. 22 lakh allegedly deposited during search and seizure raid. Commissioner justified freezing bank accounts through speaking order. Regarding seized devices, Commissioner directed to examine retaining them beyond 30 days as per Section 67(3) of CGST Act and ensure data access to petitioner. Counter-affidavit by respondents on refund claim not on record, to be filed before next hearing on 20.08.2024. Matter listed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.