Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank...
Petitioner seeks release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized electronic devices & refund of Rs. 22 lakh after search & seizure raid.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized laptops, CPUs, mobile phones and documents, and refund of Rs. 22 lakh allegedly deposited during search and seizure raid. Commissioner justified freezing bank accounts through speaking order. Regarding seized devices, Commissioner directed to examine retaining them beyond 30 days as per Section 67(3) of CGST Act and ensure data access to petitioner. Counter-affidavit by respondents on refund claim not on record, to be filed before next hearing on 20.08.2024. Matter listed accordingly.
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized laptops, CPUs, mobile phones and documents, and refund of Rs. 22 lakh allegedly deposited during search and seizure raid. Commissioner justified freezing bank accounts through speaking order. Regarding seized devices, Commissioner directed to examine retaining them beyond 30 days as per Section 67(3) of CGST Act and ensure data access to petitioner. Counter-affidavit by respondents on refund claim not on record, to be filed before next hearing on 20.08.2024. Matter listed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.