Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Food supplement classification requires common parlance and authoritative tests, preventing treatment as proprietary Ayurvedic medicines without suppo...
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank...
Petitioner seeks release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized electronic devices & refund of Rs. 22 lakh after search & seizure raid.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized laptops, CPUs, mobile phones and documents, and refund of Rs. 22 lakh allegedly deposited during search and seizure raid. Commissioner justified freezing bank accounts through speaking order. Regarding seized devices, Commissioner directed to examine retaining them beyond 30 days as per Section 67(3) of CGST Act and ensure data access to petitioner. Counter-affidavit by respondents on refund claim not on record, to be filed before next hearing on 20.08.2024. Matter listed accordingly.
Petitioner sought release of provisionally attached bank accounts, return of seized laptops, CPUs, mobile phones and documents, and refund of Rs. 22 lakh allegedly deposited during search and seizure raid. Commissioner justified freezing bank accounts through speaking order. Regarding seized devices, Commissioner directed to examine retaining them beyond 30 days as per Section 67(3) of CGST Act and ensure data access to petitioner. Counter-affidavit by respondents on refund claim not on record, to be filed before next hearing on 20.08.2024. Matter listed accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.