Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Petitioner sought implementation of Appellate Authority's order to release seized gold ornaments due to discrepancy between delivery challan quantity and actual quantity. Court held that although goods are liable for confiscation, they can be released upon payment of fine considering they are petitioner's stock-in-trade. Petitions disposed, directing release of entire 1647.970 grams of seized gold to petitioners upon executing bonds, undertaking not to alienate covered property until proceedings culminate. Parties entitled to approach Appellate Tribunal if aggrieved by Appellate Authority's proceedings.
Petitioner sought implementation of Appellate Authority's order to release seized gold ornaments due to discrepancy between delivery challan quantity and actual quantity. Court held that although goods are liable for confiscation, they can be released upon payment of fine considering they are petitioner's stock-in-trade. Petitions disposed, directing release of entire 1647.970 grams of seized gold to petitioners upon executing bonds, undertaking not to alienate covered property until proceedings culminate. Parties entitled to approach Appellate Tribunal if aggrieved by Appellate Authority's proceedings.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
