Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Applicability of Section 153C and Section 148 of the Income Tax Act in cases involving seizure of incriminating material during search or requisition of documents related to an assessee other than the one against whom the search was conducted. The Rajasthan High Court's judgment clarified that if the twin conditions for invoking Section 153C are satisfied, the Assessing Officer must proceed u/s 153C, issuing notices for filing returns for relevant preceding years and assessing or reassessing the total income. Resorting to Section 148 is not permissible in such cases. The findings of the Delhi ITAT in the case of M/s Mah Impex Pvt. Ltd. involving the Surendra Kumar Jain Group were applied, allowing the assessee's appeal.
Applicability of Section 153C and Section 148 of the Income Tax Act in cases involving seizure of incriminating material during search or requisition of documents related to an assessee other than the one against whom the search was conducted. The Rajasthan High Court's judgment clarified that if the twin conditions for invoking Section 153C are satisfied, the Assessing Officer must proceed u/s 153C, issuing notices for filing returns for relevant preceding years and assessing or reassessing the total income. Resorting to Section 148 is not permissible in such cases. The findings of the Delhi ITAT in the case of M/s Mah Impex Pvt. Ltd. involving the Surendra Kumar Jain Group were applied, allowing the assessee's appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.