Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The case pertains to the disallowance of product development expenses written off due to technological obsolescence. The assessee had abandoned a software development project titled "ProHR" as it was unlikely to yield economic benefits. The authorities presumed the project was completed, leading to disallowance of expenses. However, the project was not even put for initial trial, rendering it unsellable. Since the project was abandoned without any enduring benefit or existence of new software, the expenses were held to be revenue in nature. Consequently, the addition made by the lower authorities was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The case pertains to the disallowance of product development expenses written off due to technological obsolescence. The assessee had abandoned a software development project titled "ProHR" as it was unlikely to yield economic benefits. The authorities presumed the project was completed, leading to disallowance of expenses. However, the project was not even put for initial trial, rendering it unsellable. Since the project was abandoned without any enduring benefit or existence of new software, the expenses were held to be revenue in nature. Consequently, the addition made by the lower authorities was deleted, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.