Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
The assessee, Adobe Systems Software Ireland Limited, is a company incorporated under Irish laws and a tax resident of Ireland per the India-Ireland tax treaty. The tribunal held that the issue of existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India is covered by a coordinate bench order, which deleted additions made by the Assessing Officer. It was held that no addition was proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer for Adobe India regarding marketing support services. Attributing profits to the alleged PE (Adobe India) would contradict Supreme Court rulings in Morgan Stanley and E-Funds cases. The tribunal rejected the reasons and conclusions on which the Assessing Officer and Dispute Resolution Panel's findings of PE existence were premised. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted on merits for the year under consideration, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
The assessee, Adobe Systems Software Ireland Limited, is a company incorporated under Irish laws and a tax resident of Ireland per the India-Ireland tax treaty. The tribunal held that the issue of existence of a Permanent Establishment (PE) in India is covered by a coordinate bench order, which deleted additions made by the Assessing Officer. It was held that no addition was proposed by the Transfer Pricing Officer for Adobe India regarding marketing support services. Attributing profits to the alleged PE (Adobe India) would contradict Supreme Court rulings in Morgan Stanley and E-Funds cases. The tribunal rejected the reasons and conclusions on which the Assessing Officer and Dispute Resolution Panel's findings of PE existence were premised. Consequently, the additions made by the Assessing Officer were deleted on merits for the year under consideration, and the assessee's appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
