Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 30, 2024Case LawsAT
Tribunal clarified that its order dated 26.05.2022 did not modify or vary the earlier orders dated 15.10.2018 and 11.01.2019, except for directing sealed cover containing arbitral award to be opened. Despite award being communicated to respondents, they cannot enforce it due to the interim direction dated 15.10.2018, affirmed on 12.03.2020, prohibiting enforcement or execution of arbitral awards against IL&FS or its group companies. The application filed by respondent seeking restraint on enforcement or execution of arbitral award was allowed.
Tribunal clarified that its order dated 26.05.2022 did not modify or vary the earlier orders dated 15.10.2018 and 11.01.2019, except for directing sealed cover containing arbitral award to be opened. Despite award being communicated to respondents, they cannot enforce it due to the interim direction dated 15.10.2018, affirmed on 12.03.2020, prohibiting enforcement or execution of arbitral awards against IL&FS or its group companies. The application filed by respondent seeking restraint on enforcement or execution of arbitral award was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.