Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 30, 2024Case LawsAT
Once symbolic possession of the property is taken over by the appellant under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevents the appellant from further proceedings against the property until the moratorium is lifted. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order barring the appellant from proceeding further under SARFAESI Act regarding the subject property while the moratorium is in effect, dismissing the appeal. This aligns with the recent Delhi High Court judgment that a bank cannot proceed under SARFAESI Act due to the interim moratorium arising from pending insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantor.
Once symbolic possession of the property is taken over by the appellant under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevents the appellant from further proceedings against the property until the moratorium is lifted. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order barring the appellant from proceeding further under SARFAESI Act regarding the subject property while the moratorium is in effect, dismissing the appeal. This aligns with the recent Delhi High Court judgment that a bank cannot proceed under SARFAESI Act due to the interim moratorium arising from pending insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
