TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Functional comparability governs software-service benchmarking: dissimilar companies are excluded, while related-party filters, margins and working-ca...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 30, 2024Case LawsAT
Once symbolic possession of the property is taken over by the appellant under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevents the appellant from further proceedings against the property until the moratorium is lifted. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order barring the appellant from proceeding further under SARFAESI Act regarding the subject property while the moratorium is in effect, dismissing the appeal. This aligns with the recent Delhi High Court judgment that a bank cannot proceed under SARFAESI Act due to the interim moratorium arising from pending insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantor.
Once symbolic possession of the property is taken over by the appellant under the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the moratorium u/s 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code prevents the appellant from further proceedings against the property until the moratorium is lifted. The Appellate Tribunal upheld the order barring the appellant from proceeding further under SARFAESI Act regarding the subject property while the moratorium is in effect, dismissing the appeal. This aligns with the recent Delhi High Court judgment that a bank cannot proceed under SARFAESI Act due to the interim moratorium arising from pending insolvency proceedings against the personal guarantor.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
