Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Eligibility for input CENVAT credit utilization, invocation of extended period of limitation, and imposition of fines and penalties in a case involving job-worked goods. The appellant failed to comply with record-keeping requirements u/r 9(5) of the Central Excise Rules, making it ineligible for CENVAT credit on inputs used in job-worked goods. However, the appellant can avail credit subject to verification of duty-paid invoices/documents within six months. The extended period was rightly invoked due to non-disclosure of job-work activity and non-payment of excise duty/service tax. The executive director's claim of mistaken impression was rejected, and penalties were upheld for willful contravention. While penalties on other appellants were reduced, the main appeal was partly remanded and partly allowed by the CESTAT.
Eligibility for input CENVAT credit utilization, invocation of extended period of limitation, and imposition of fines and penalties in a case involving job-worked goods. The appellant failed to comply with record-keeping requirements u/r 9(5) of the Central Excise Rules, making it ineligible for CENVAT credit on inputs used in job-worked goods. However, the appellant can avail credit subject to verification of duty-paid invoices/documents within six months. The extended period was rightly invoked due to non-disclosure of job-work activity and non-payment of excise duty/service tax. The executive director's claim of mistaken impression was rejected, and penalties were upheld for willful contravention. While penalties on other appellants were reduced, the main appeal was partly remanded and partly allowed by the CESTAT.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
