Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Time of supply for continuous supply of goods under the CGST Act. Section 12(2) provides for fixing the time of supply as either the date of invoice or the date of payment, whichever is earlier. However, for continuous supply, the relevant period is the period for which the invoice is raised, rather than the point when the invoice is raised. In the present case, the petitioner was required to raise invoices for electricity supply by the 7th of the following month, as per the power purchase agreement. Thus, furnishing the refund application for the preceding month would be in accordance with the Act and Rules. The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities.
Time of supply for continuous supply of goods under the CGST Act. Section 12(2) provides for fixing the time of supply as either the date of invoice or the date of payment, whichever is earlier. However, for continuous supply, the relevant period is the period for which the invoice is raised, rather than the point when the invoice is raised. In the present case, the petitioner was required to raise invoices for electricity supply by the 7th of the following month, as per the power purchase agreement. Thus, furnishing the refund application for the preceding month would be in accordance with the Act and Rules. The High Court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the orders of the lower authorities.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
