Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
Income-tax exemption for specified regulatory fees and government grants applies subject to non-commercial activity and continuing compliance conditio...
Digital accessibility audit and remediation deadlines extended, while all other disability-compliance obligations for regulated entities remain unchan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Court found violation of principles of natural justice as petitioner did not receive notices for proceedings leading to impugned orders. Though e-mail service cannot be ruled out, cancellation of registration could have resulted in petitioner not checking that e-mail ID. Court treated present proceedings as notice, granted three weeks to file response, and remanded matter to adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after giving proper opportunity to petitioner. Impugned order set aside.
Court found violation of principles of natural justice as petitioner did not receive notices for proceedings leading to impugned orders. Though e-mail service cannot be ruled out, cancellation of registration could have resulted in petitioner not checking that e-mail ID. Court treated present proceedings as notice, granted three weeks to file response, and remanded matter to adjudicating authority for fresh adjudication after giving proper opportunity to petitioner. Impugned order set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.