Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Deduction u/s 80IA was allowed despite delay in filing Form 10CCB due to technical glitches on the Income Tax portal. The form was filed 1 hour 22 minutes after the due date of 31.10.2022. CIT(A) relied on the assessee's statement and allowed the deduction. ITAT held that the delay was beyond the assessee's control and cannot be construed as discrepancy or failure on their part. The prescribed form was available before AO when return was processed. Case laws on exemption notifications and CBDT Circular 9/2015 regarding delay in filing refund claim and carry forward losses were deemed irrelevant. As the form was filed before the due date of return filing with a slight delay, and the delay was not due to negligence or inaction by the assessee, the deduction was allowed in the interest of justice. The delay was not attributed to the assessee, hence no penal action was imposed.
Deduction u/s 80IA was allowed despite delay in filing Form 10CCB due to technical glitches on the Income Tax portal. The form was filed 1 hour 22 minutes after the due date of 31.10.2022. CIT(A) relied on the assessee's statement and allowed the deduction. ITAT held that the delay was beyond the assessee's control and cannot be construed as discrepancy or failure on their part. The prescribed form was available before AO when return was processed. Case laws on exemption notifications and CBDT Circular 9/2015 regarding delay in filing refund claim and carry forward losses were deemed irrelevant. As the form was filed before the due date of return filing with a slight delay, and the delay was not due to negligence or inaction by the assessee, the deduction was allowed in the interest of justice. The delay was not attributed to the assessee, hence no penal action was imposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
