Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
Cancellation of registration u/s 12AB(4) - violation of provisions of Sections 11(1)(a), 11(1)(d), and 13(1)(c). The reference made under the second proviso of Section 143(3) to the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) to whom the Assessing Officer was subordinate is not permissible. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi, having territorial jurisdiction specified in the relevant notifications, is the appropriate authority for claiming exemption u/s 12A. The order passed by the PCIT cancelling the appellant society's registration based on the Assessing Officer's reference is flawed and without jurisdiction. The reference u/s 12AA can be made only during the pendency of the assessment proceedings, not after conclusion. The second proviso to Section 143(3), enabling reference to the PCIT u/ss 12AA and 12AB, was inserted effective April 1, 2022, and cannot be applied retrospectively. The show cause notices issued by the PCIT invoking Sections 12AA(5) and 12AB(4) for cancellation of registration for alleged violations prior to April 1, 2022, are erroneous and liable to be quashed. The final order by the PCIT cancelling the appellant society's registration for Assessment Years 2015.
Cancellation of registration u/s 12AB(4) - violation of provisions of Sections 11(1)(a), 11(1)(d), and 13(1)(c). The reference made under the second proviso of Section 143(3) to the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) to whom the Assessing Officer was subordinate is not permissible. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Delhi, having territorial jurisdiction specified in the relevant notifications, is the appropriate authority for claiming exemption u/s 12A. The order passed by the PCIT cancelling the appellant society's registration based on the Assessing Officer's reference is flawed and without jurisdiction. The reference u/s 12AA can be made only during the pendency of the assessment proceedings, not after conclusion. The second proviso to Section 143(3), enabling reference to the PCIT u/ss 12AA and 12AB, was inserted effective April 1, 2022, and cannot be applied retrospectively. The show cause notices issued by the PCIT invoking Sections 12AA(5) and 12AB(4) for cancellation of registration for alleged violations prior to April 1, 2022, are erroneous and liable to be quashed. The final order by the PCIT cancelling the appellant society's registration for Assessment Years 2015.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
