Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 29, 2024Case LawsHC
The High Court held that u/s 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), while a moratorium prohibits institution or continuation of suits against the corporate debtor, it does not prohibit the continuation of a counter-claim filed by the corporate debtor. A counter-claim, as defined under the Civil Procedure Code, relates to a cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff. Therefore, the recordal of evidence should continue regarding the counter-claim filed by the appellant/defendant, but the moratorium will operate against the claim made by the respondent/plaintiff. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court held that u/s 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), while a moratorium prohibits institution or continuation of suits against the corporate debtor, it does not prohibit the continuation of a counter-claim filed by the corporate debtor. A counter-claim, as defined under the Civil Procedure Code, relates to a cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff. Therefore, the recordal of evidence should continue regarding the counter-claim filed by the appellant/defendant, but the moratorium will operate against the claim made by the respondent/plaintiff. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.