Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 29, 2024Case LawsHC
The High Court held that u/s 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), while a moratorium prohibits institution or continuation of suits against the corporate debtor, it does not prohibit the continuation of a counter-claim filed by the corporate debtor. A counter-claim, as defined under the Civil Procedure Code, relates to a cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff. Therefore, the recordal of evidence should continue regarding the counter-claim filed by the appellant/defendant, but the moratorium will operate against the claim made by the respondent/plaintiff. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
The High Court held that u/s 14(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), while a moratorium prohibits institution or continuation of suits against the corporate debtor, it does not prohibit the continuation of a counter-claim filed by the corporate debtor. A counter-claim, as defined under the Civil Procedure Code, relates to a cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff. Therefore, the recordal of evidence should continue regarding the counter-claim filed by the appellant/defendant, but the moratorium will operate against the claim made by the respondent/plaintiff. The appeal was disposed of accordingly.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.