Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Service tax liability on construction and sale of complexes/houses/flats, real estate agent services, reverse charge mechanism for legal charges, manpower supply, and works contract services, as well as the extended period of limitation. It holds that service tax is not leviable on construction services, and the appellant is not acting as a real estate agent, hence not liable for service tax on certain receipts. The appellant, being a statutory body and not a business entity, is not liable for service tax under reverse charge mechanism. The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked as there is no suppression or fraud with intent to evade tax by a government authority. Consequently, the impugned orders are set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Service tax liability on construction and sale of complexes/houses/flats, real estate agent services, reverse charge mechanism for legal charges, manpower supply, and works contract services, as well as the extended period of limitation. It holds that service tax is not leviable on construction services, and the appellant is not acting as a real estate agent, hence not liable for service tax on certain receipts. The appellant, being a statutory body and not a business entity, is not liable for service tax under reverse charge mechanism. The extended period of limitation cannot be invoked as there is no suppression or fraud with intent to evade tax by a government authority. Consequently, the impugned orders are set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
