Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
Page of 4830
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96587 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal of High Speed Diesel manufactured in Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 can be resorted to while construing the levy and collection under the three Finance Acts. The Supreme Court's judgment in Unicorn supports the appellant's case, holding that exemption provisions u/s 5A of the Central Excise Act could have been applied if the Central Government chose to do so. The appellant was justified in contending that the Central Excise Act provisions apply equally to the Finance Act provisions, and the Finance Act duties, being additional to excise duty, are in the nature of excise duty u/s 3 of the Central Excise Act. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Levy and collection of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED), Road and Infrastructure Cess (RIC), and Agriculture Infrastructure and Development Cess (AIDC) on removal of High Speed Diesel manufactured in Special Economic Zone (SEZ) to Domestic Tariff Area (DTA). The provisions of the Central Excise Act, 1944 can be resorted to while construing the levy and collection under the three Finance Acts. The Supreme Court's judgment in Unicorn supports the appellant's case, holding that exemption provisions u/s 5A of the Central Excise Act could have been applied if the Central Government chose to do so. The appellant was justified in contending that the Central Excise Act provisions apply equally to the Finance Act provisions, and the Finance Act duties, being additional to excise duty, are in the nature of excise duty u/s 3 of the Central Excise Act. The impugned order is set aside, and the appeal is allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4830 
Join Channel 
