Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Dishonor of cheque case - vicarious liability of directors u/s 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Court held specific, unambiguous averments required in complaint to establish director's role and responsibility for company's conduct. Mere designation insufficient; complainant must show how accused was in charge of day-to-day affairs. Section 141 raises legal fiction of vicarious liability but strict compliance with statutory requirements necessary. Complaint lacked specific allegations against petitioner directors, who were non-executive/independent directors. Sections 138 and 141 aimed at enhancing credibility of negotiable instruments, not misuse. Penal provisions to be strictly construed. Complaint insufficient to attract Section 141, hence summoning order against petitioners quashed. Petition allowed.
Dishonor of cheque case - vicarious liability of directors u/s 138 read with Sections 141 and 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act. Court held specific, unambiguous averments required in complaint to establish director's role and responsibility for company's conduct. Mere designation insufficient; complainant must show how accused was in charge of day-to-day affairs. Section 141 raises legal fiction of vicarious liability but strict compliance with statutory requirements necessary. Complaint lacked specific allegations against petitioner directors, who were non-executive/independent directors. Sections 138 and 141 aimed at enhancing credibility of negotiable instruments, not misuse. Penal provisions to be strictly construed. Complaint insufficient to attract Section 141, hence summoning order against petitioners quashed. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.