Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
The High Court quashed the rectification notice, rectification order, and notice of demand issued u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the order of determination made by the Designated Authority under the DTVSV Act attained finality and could not be reopened or revised by any authority under the Income Tax Act. The court observed that the determination made under the DTVSV Act is rendered final, except where the application is found to suffer from an incorrect declaration or suppression of material facts. The action u/s 154 did not fall within the ambit of the exception provided in Section 4(6) of the DTVSV Act. The court emphasized the legislative intent of the DTVSV Act to accord closure to tax disputes and the finality attached to the determination made thereunder.
The High Court quashed the rectification notice, rectification order, and notice of demand issued u/s 154 of the Income Tax Act, holding that the order of determination made by the Designated Authority under the DTVSV Act attained finality and could not be reopened or revised by any authority under the Income Tax Act. The court observed that the determination made under the DTVSV Act is rendered final, except where the application is found to suffer from an incorrect declaration or suppression of material facts. The action u/s 154 did not fall within the ambit of the exception provided in Section 4(6) of the DTVSV Act. The court emphasized the legislative intent of the DTVSV Act to accord closure to tax disputes and the finality attached to the determination made thereunder.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.