Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has wide powers under the Companies Act and NCLT Rules, 2016 to inquire into allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The NCLT can examine alleged forgery of documents that purportedly led to changes in directorship and transfer of shares. Sending disputed documents for forensic investigation is part of this inquiry. The NCLT is empowered to adjudicate such issues and give findings based on contentions advanced by counsel and forensic reports. The matter was remanded back to the NCLT for adjudication, with the appeal disposed of by way of remand.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has wide powers under the Companies Act and NCLT Rules, 2016 to inquire into allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The NCLT can examine alleged forgery of documents that purportedly led to changes in directorship and transfer of shares. Sending disputed documents for forensic investigation is part of this inquiry. The NCLT is empowered to adjudicate such issues and give findings based on contentions advanced by counsel and forensic reports. The matter was remanded back to the NCLT for adjudication, with the appeal disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
