Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
561 to 580 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has wide powers under the Companies Act and NCLT Rules, 2016 to inquire into allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The NCLT can examine alleged forgery of documents that purportedly led to changes in directorship and transfer of shares. Sending disputed documents for forensic investigation is part of this inquiry. The NCLT is empowered to adjudicate such issues and give findings based on contentions advanced by counsel and forensic reports. The matter was remanded back to the NCLT for adjudication, with the appeal disposed of by way of remand.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has wide powers under the Companies Act and NCLT Rules, 2016 to inquire into allegations of oppression and mismanagement. The NCLT can examine alleged forgery of documents that purportedly led to changes in directorship and transfer of shares. Sending disputed documents for forensic investigation is part of this inquiry. The NCLT is empowered to adjudicate such issues and give findings based on contentions advanced by counsel and forensic reports. The matter was remanded back to the NCLT for adjudication, with the appeal disposed of by way of remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.