Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Cash deposits during the demonetization period were recorded in the books of accounts, with the source maintained. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 69A and charged tax u/s 115BBE, treating the deposits as unexplained money. However, Section 69A is applicable when the assessee is the owner of money, bullion, jewelry, or valuable articles not recorded from any source. Since the cash deposits were recorded with the source maintained, invoking Section 69A was incorrect. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted, and the decision is in favor of the assessee.
Cash deposits during the demonetization period were recorded in the books of accounts, with the source maintained. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 69A and charged tax u/s 115BBE, treating the deposits as unexplained money. However, Section 69A is applicable when the assessee is the owner of money, bullion, jewelry, or valuable articles not recorded from any source. Since the cash deposits were recorded with the source maintained, invoking Section 69A was incorrect. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted, and the decision is in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.