Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Page of 4801
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
341 to 360 of 96001 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Cash deposits during the demonetization period were recorded in the books of accounts, with the source maintained. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 69A and charged tax u/s 115BBE, treating the deposits as unexplained money. However, Section 69A is applicable when the assessee is the owner of money, bullion, jewelry, or valuable articles not recorded from any source. Since the cash deposits were recorded with the source maintained, invoking Section 69A was incorrect. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted, and the decision is in favor of the assessee.
Cash deposits during the demonetization period were recorded in the books of accounts, with the source maintained. The Assessing Officer invoked Section 69A and charged tax u/s 115BBE, treating the deposits as unexplained money. However, Section 69A is applicable when the assessee is the owner of money, bullion, jewelry, or valuable articles not recorded from any source. Since the cash deposits were recorded with the source maintained, invoking Section 69A was incorrect. Consequently, the addition made by the Assessing Officer is liable to be deleted, and the decision is in favor of the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
