Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The court emphasized the need to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits, albeit by putting the petitioner on terms.
The court held that the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) by the department due to discrepancy between GSTR 3B and auto-populated GSTR 2A violated principles of natural justice as the petitioner was not provided a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for reconsideration, subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The court emphasized the need to provide an opportunity to the petitioner to contest the tax demand on merits, albeit by putting the petitioner on terms.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
