Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
The High Court held that the deduction u/s 33AC for creating a reserve to acquire new ships must be factored in while computing the deduction u/s 80-I, which is based on profits from operating ships. The amendment in 1996 capping the Section 33AC deduction at 50% of profits did not change the core character of the allowance. If the Section 33AC deduction results in no profits from ships, the Section 80-I deduction cannot be claimed. Regarding proportionate allocation of the Section 33AC deduction between qualifying and non-qualifying ships for Section 80-I purposes, the High Court stated that it cannot provide its own basis for apportionment as an appellate forum.
The High Court held that the deduction u/s 33AC for creating a reserve to acquire new ships must be factored in while computing the deduction u/s 80-I, which is based on profits from operating ships. The amendment in 1996 capping the Section 33AC deduction at 50% of profits did not change the core character of the allowance. If the Section 33AC deduction results in no profits from ships, the Section 80-I deduction cannot be claimed. Regarding proportionate allocation of the Section 33AC deduction between qualifying and non-qualifying ships for Section 80-I purposes, the High Court stated that it cannot provide its own basis for apportionment as an appellate forum.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
