Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
Liquidator appointment under Section 34 requires consideration of creditor recommendations, valid professional authorisation, and preservation of vali...
The assessment order was prima facie passed within the period of limitation on 30.09.2021, as evidenced by the presumption of validity and the email and physical dispatch to the petitioner. However, the petitioner's explanation dated 29.09.2021 was not considered, and the assessment appeared to be completed hurriedly to avoid limitation. To balance the interests, the High Court set aside the impugned assessment order and remitted the case to the respondents to pass orders on merits within six months, without finding fault on either party regarding the limitation issue.
The assessment order was prima facie passed within the period of limitation on 30.09.2021, as evidenced by the presumption of validity and the email and physical dispatch to the petitioner. However, the petitioner's explanation dated 29.09.2021 was not considered, and the assessment appeared to be completed hurriedly to avoid limitation. To balance the interests, the High Court set aside the impugned assessment order and remitted the case to the respondents to pass orders on merits within six months, without finding fault on either party regarding the limitation issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
