Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Unsecured loans received by assessee were supported by documentary evidence proving identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of lenders. No contrary material brought by Revenue to doubt transactions. Hence, no addition u/s 68 was warranted and corresponding disallowance of interest u/s 69C was rightly deleted. Assessee did not earn any exempt income, only gains from investments. Section 14A disallowance applies when exempt income is received/receivable. As no exempt income was earned, disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was correctly deleted by CIT(A), even considering prospective amendment. Order in favor of assessee upheld.
Unsecured loans received by assessee were supported by documentary evidence proving identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of lenders. No contrary material brought by Revenue to doubt transactions. Hence, no addition u/s 68 was warranted and corresponding disallowance of interest u/s 69C was rightly deleted. Assessee did not earn any exempt income, only gains from investments. Section 14A disallowance applies when exempt income is received/receivable. As no exempt income was earned, disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was correctly deleted by CIT(A), even considering prospective amendment. Order in favor of assessee upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.