Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Unsecured loans received by assessee were supported by documentary evidence proving identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of lenders. No contrary material brought by Revenue to doubt transactions. Hence, no addition u/s 68 was warranted and corresponding disallowance of interest u/s 69C was rightly deleted. Assessee did not earn any exempt income, only gains from investments. Section 14A disallowance applies when exempt income is received/receivable. As no exempt income was earned, disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was correctly deleted by CIT(A), even considering prospective amendment. Order in favor of assessee upheld.
Unsecured loans received by assessee were supported by documentary evidence proving identity, genuineness, and creditworthiness of lenders. No contrary material brought by Revenue to doubt transactions. Hence, no addition u/s 68 was warranted and corresponding disallowance of interest u/s 69C was rightly deleted. Assessee did not earn any exempt income, only gains from investments. Section 14A disallowance applies when exempt income is received/receivable. As no exempt income was earned, disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D was correctly deleted by CIT(A), even considering prospective amendment. Order in favor of assessee upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
