Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was denied by invoking Section 80A(5) as the assessee failed to file a valid return of income as per Section 139. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue Authorities' decision, stating that even after the substitution of Section 80AC by the Finance Act, 2018, for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i), the assessee must file a valid return within the stipulated time u/s 139, which was not done. Since the return was not filed in accordance with Section 139, the claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was rightly held inadmissible by the Revenue Authorities. The decision was against the assessee.
Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was denied by invoking Section 80A(5) as the assessee failed to file a valid return of income as per Section 139. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue Authorities' decision, stating that even after the substitution of Section 80AC by the Finance Act, 2018, for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i), the assessee must file a valid return within the stipulated time u/s 139, which was not done. Since the return was not filed in accordance with Section 139, the claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was rightly held inadmissible by the Revenue Authorities. The decision was against the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.