Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was denied by invoking Section 80A(5) as the assessee failed to file a valid return of income as per Section 139. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue Authorities' decision, stating that even after the substitution of Section 80AC by the Finance Act, 2018, for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i), the assessee must file a valid return within the stipulated time u/s 139, which was not done. Since the return was not filed in accordance with Section 139, the claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was rightly held inadmissible by the Revenue Authorities. The decision was against the assessee.
Deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was denied by invoking Section 80A(5) as the assessee failed to file a valid return of income as per Section 139. The Tribunal upheld the Revenue Authorities' decision, stating that even after the substitution of Section 80AC by the Finance Act, 2018, for claiming deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i), the assessee must file a valid return within the stipulated time u/s 139, which was not done. Since the return was not filed in accordance with Section 139, the claim for deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) was rightly held inadmissible by the Revenue Authorities. The decision was against the assessee.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4788
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
