Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
An application seeking bail for recovery of contraband items was filed. The applicant submitted being falsely implicated. Considering the applicant's lack of criminal history, no flight risk or potential to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, and the fact that contentions are yet to be tested at trial, the court granted bail. Additionally, co-accused in the case were previously granted bail. Given the severity of potential punishment if convicted and period of incarceration, and no apprehension expressed by the prosecution regarding fleeing justice or tampering with evidence, the court found the applicant entitled to bail at this stage without expressing opinion on merits. The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties to the court's satisfaction.
An application seeking bail for recovery of contraband items was filed. The applicant submitted being falsely implicated. Considering the applicant's lack of criminal history, no flight risk or potential to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, and the fact that contentions are yet to be tested at trial, the court granted bail. Additionally, co-accused in the case were previously granted bail. Given the severity of potential punishment if convicted and period of incarceration, and no apprehension expressed by the prosecution regarding fleeing justice or tampering with evidence, the court found the applicant entitled to bail at this stage without expressing opinion on merits. The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties to the court's satisfaction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
