Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4794
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
621 to 640 of 95875 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An application seeking bail for recovery of contraband items was filed. The applicant submitted being falsely implicated. Considering the applicant's lack of criminal history, no flight risk or potential to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, and the fact that contentions are yet to be tested at trial, the court granted bail. Additionally, co-accused in the case were previously granted bail. Given the severity of potential punishment if convicted and period of incarceration, and no apprehension expressed by the prosecution regarding fleeing justice or tampering with evidence, the court found the applicant entitled to bail at this stage without expressing opinion on merits. The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties to the court's satisfaction.
An application seeking bail for recovery of contraband items was filed. The applicant submitted being falsely implicated. Considering the applicant's lack of criminal history, no flight risk or potential to influence witnesses or tamper with evidence, and the fact that contentions are yet to be tested at trial, the court granted bail. Additionally, co-accused in the case were previously granted bail. Given the severity of potential punishment if convicted and period of incarceration, and no apprehension expressed by the prosecution regarding fleeing justice or tampering with evidence, the court found the applicant entitled to bail at this stage without expressing opinion on merits. The applicant was ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing personal bond with two sureties to the court's satisfaction.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4794
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
