Commercial vehicle depreciation, scientifically determined warranty provisions and exempt-income disallowances were resolved in favour of the taxpayer...
Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the validity of the sale of immovable property by the respondent bank under the SARFAESI Act. The appellant company argued that its shareholder does not have ownership rights over the property. However, the NCLT held that the respondent bank acquired shares and a flat through valid SARFAESI proceedings, amounting to transmission of shares by operation of law. The NCLAT relied on precedents to affirm that an award by an arbitrator falls within the ambit of transmission by operation of law, and the NCLT has powers to condone delays u/s 58 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding no reason to interfere with the reasoned NCLT order.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the validity of the sale of immovable property by the respondent bank under the SARFAESI Act. The appellant company argued that its shareholder does not have ownership rights over the property. However, the NCLT held that the respondent bank acquired shares and a flat through valid SARFAESI proceedings, amounting to transmission of shares by operation of law. The NCLAT relied on precedents to affirm that an award by an arbitrator falls within the ambit of transmission by operation of law, and the NCLT has powers to condone delays u/s 58 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding no reason to interfere with the reasoned NCLT order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.