Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the validity of the sale of immovable property by the respondent bank under the SARFAESI Act. The appellant company argued that its shareholder does not have ownership rights over the property. However, the NCLT held that the respondent bank acquired shares and a flat through valid SARFAESI proceedings, amounting to transmission of shares by operation of law. The NCLAT relied on precedents to affirm that an award by an arbitrator falls within the ambit of transmission by operation of law, and the NCLT has powers to condone delays u/s 58 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding no reason to interfere with the reasoned NCLT order.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) upheld the validity of the sale of immovable property by the respondent bank under the SARFAESI Act. The appellant company argued that its shareholder does not have ownership rights over the property. However, the NCLT held that the respondent bank acquired shares and a flat through valid SARFAESI proceedings, amounting to transmission of shares by operation of law. The NCLAT relied on precedents to affirm that an award by an arbitrator falls within the ambit of transmission by operation of law, and the NCLT has powers to condone delays u/s 58 of the Companies Act, 2013. The NCLAT dismissed the appeal, finding no reason to interfere with the reasoned NCLT order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
