Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Insolvency and BankruptcyAugust 27, 2024Case LawsAT
Statutory framework under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) examined. Settlement proposal by appellant rejected by Committee of Creditors (CoC) u/s 12A, as it sought release of personal guarantees, contrary to approved resolution plan retaining guarantees. CoC's decision well-considered, not arbitrary, taken with 100% voting share. Supreme Court precedent distinguishes Section 12A withdrawal from approved resolution plan u/s 31 or scheme under Companies Act. Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected appellant's application challenging CoC decision. Appeal dismissed as devoid of merit by Appellate Tribunal.
Statutory framework under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) examined. Settlement proposal by appellant rejected by Committee of Creditors (CoC) u/s 12A, as it sought release of personal guarantees, contrary to approved resolution plan retaining guarantees. CoC's decision well-considered, not arbitrary, taken with 100% voting share. Supreme Court precedent distinguishes Section 12A withdrawal from approved resolution plan u/s 31 or scheme under Companies Act. Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected appellant's application challenging CoC decision. Appeal dismissed as devoid of merit by Appellate Tribunal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
