Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Writ petition under Article 226 dismissed due to availability of statutory remedy. Principles of natural justice not violated as petitioner failed to establish incapacity to reply to show cause notice. Court granted 30 days to file appeal before Appellate Authority, directing Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on merits without considering limitation if appeal filed within stipulated period. Interest of justice met by granting opportunity to avail statutory remedy.
Writ petition under Article 226 dismissed due to availability of statutory remedy. Principles of natural justice not violated as petitioner failed to establish incapacity to reply to show cause notice. Court granted 30 days to file appeal before Appellate Authority, directing Commissioner (Appeals) to decide on merits without considering limitation if appeal filed within stipulated period. Interest of justice met by granting opportunity to avail statutory remedy.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.