Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    GST on seigniorage fee and royalty stayed pending Supreme Court ruling; High Court applies earlier identical order.
    GST assessment remitted for fresh adjudication after taxpayer deposits part of the disputed tax and files supporting documents.
    Knowledge of liability to confiscation is essential for customs penalty under section 112(b); local purchase alone is insufficient.
    Country of Origin verification under Interim Rules must follow the prescribed retroactive mechanism before denying preferential duty benefit.
    Admitted facts need not be proved in customs adjudication where the importer contests only one limited valuation issue.
    Employment relationship excludes GST where bank pigmy agents act under control, supervision, and employment conditions.
    Prior tax payment proof can be placed through rectification before recovery to avoid double recovery of GST demand.
    Refund claims under GST require examination of the service agreement before classifying supplies as export or intermediary services.
    Concessional GST rate linked to input tax credit reversal; higher tax rate could not be applied merely for wrongful credit availment.
    Input tax credit bar limited to availed tax component; depreciation on lapsed banking-company credit does not trigger double benefit.
    Directors' personal liability for company GST dues requires statutory conditions and a hearing before bank account attachment
    Writ jurisdiction declined against GST adjudication order; petitioner left to statutory appeal on interest under Section 50.
    Medical reimbursement threshold not liable to Fringe Benefit Tax; levy on amounts up to the exempt limit was set aside.
    Concealment penalty depends on intention, and a conscious false exemption claim sustains penalty despite a claimed computation error.
    Non-service of tax demand notices led the Court to quash section 220 recovery action and preserve statutory remedies.
    Arm's length royalty pricing upheld where regulatory approval did not bind transfer pricing analysis.
    Reassessment limitation for escaped immovable property income upheld under the substituted regime; writ challenge to notices failed.
    Interest definition and independent deduction claims upheld for financial institution receipts and tax computation
    Reassessment sanction under section 151(ii) is a jurisdictional ; improper approval invalidates the section 148 notice.
    Gross profit estimation on identical facts led ITAT to adopt 0.40 per cent and delete penalty for inaccurate particulars.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Once the original reassessment orders u/s 148 were quashed, they...

Tax reassessment orders quashed; rectification order unsustainable due to non-existent original orders and income threshold not met.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax August 24, 2024 Case Laws HC
Once the original reassessment orders u/s 148 were quashed, they ceased to exist legally. The rectification order u/s 154 was premised on the quashed orders, which could not be revived or corrected. Section 154 could only be invoked if a valid order capable of rectification existed. Since the original orders were non-existent after being quashed, invoking Section 154 was impermissible. Additionally, the condition u/s 149(1)(b) requiring income escaping assessment to be Rs. 50 lakhs or more was not fulfilled. Consequently, the rectification order was unsustainable and quashed by the High Court.

Topics

Acts Income Tax