Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Social Impact Assessor certification requirements clarified: NISM Series XXIII exam or eCPE needed for renewal.
    Writ jurisdiction and alternate remedy rule: challenge to a CGST section 74 order was rejected in favour of statutory appeal.
    Regular bail in CGST input tax credit fraud was granted where custodial interrogation was unnecessary and evidence was documentary.
    Mandatory hearing requirement under GST law leads to setting aside adverse assessment and fresh decision after personal hearing
    Input tax credit mismatch on imported goods requires reconsideration where the authority ignores the taxpayer's explanation.
    Temporary identification number and separate GST notices required to preserve independent appellate remedies for company and Managing Director.
    Right to inspection of relied upon documents upheld for effective reply to a show cause notice.
    Pending rectification must be decided before dismissing a statutory appeal; appellate order set aside and fresh hearing directed.
    GST recovery attachment vacated, with payment to supplier restrained pending resolution of collateral disputes.
    Voluntary ITC reversal and Section 74(5) closure failed where the declaration was made during inspection in officers' presence.
    Amalgamation loss set-off barred where statute does not transfer predecessor losses and eight-year carry-forward limit has expired.
    Reassessment limitation and officer competence upheld as corrigendum time extension and factual disputes defeated writ interference.
    Beneficial circular on delayed Form 10IC filing extends to genuine cases despite assessment-year omission
    Reassessment under section 148 needs a live nexus with seized material; vague documents cannot justify reopening.
    Reassessment reopening needs a live nexus to seized material; vague and disconnected information cannot justify Section 148 action.
    Retrospective leave encashment exemption rejected; enhanced ceiling applies only from 01.04.2023, with Rs. 3 lakhs limit upheld.
    Dominant purpose test keeps trust receipts outside the commercial activity bar, allowing section 11 exemption.
    Revisional jurisdiction cannot be used against a DRP-directed assessment order passed in conformity with binding instructions.
    Delay cannot block a jurisdictional challenge to late fee under section 234E; appeals remanded for fresh hearing.
    Penalty for capital gains exemption lapse deleted where full disclosure and timely deposit showed no concealment.
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Once the original reassessment orders u/s 148 were quashed, they...

Tax reassessment orders quashed; rectification order unsustainable due to non-existent original orders and income threshold not met.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax August 24, 2024 Case Laws HC
Once the original reassessment orders u/s 148 were quashed, they ceased to exist legally. The rectification order u/s 154 was premised on the quashed orders, which could not be revived or corrected. Section 154 could only be invoked if a valid order capable of rectification existed. Since the original orders were non-existent after being quashed, invoking Section 154 was impermissible. Additionally, the condition u/s 149(1)(b) requiring income escaping assessment to be Rs. 50 lakhs or more was not fulfilled. Consequently, the rectification order was unsustainable and quashed by the High Court.

Topics

Acts Income Tax