Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
Relevance Default Date
    Lack of inquiry on stamp duty value difference justified section 263 revision and fresh verification.
    Make available test under DTAA applied to repair and overhaul payments, so no TDS obligation arose.
    Reassessment on borrowed satisfaction and double addition under section 68 fail where purchases and sales were already recorded.
    Borrowed satisfaction and section 68 addition failed where reopening lacked live nexus and documents proved genuine receipts.
    Notional interest on slump sale balance deleted as commercially expedient arrangement, with consistency in revenue treatment supporting the assessee.
    Real income theory and corroborated cash explanations: ITAT upheld deletion of one addition and sustained the balance.
    Bad debt deduction and section 158A procedure upheld on distinct write-off, no double deduction, and pending High Court issue
    Corpus donations for construction treated as capital receipts and held not taxable despite lack of trust registration.
    CSR donation qualifies for section 80G deduction where statutory conditions are met despite business expense disallowance.
    Beneficial ownership of bank account controls section 68 addition where deposits were made in trust account, not assessee's account.
    Penalty not automatic on deemed additions and omitted fixed deposit interest; each item must be independently tested for concealment.
    Holding period for immovable property starts when enforceable rights arise, making the gain short-term capital gain.
    Royalty and subcontract disallowances sent back for fresh verification; consequential penalty under section 270A also kept open.
    Retrospective tolerance band and agreement-date indexation defeat property tax additions; unexplained investment remanded for verification
    Cost recovery charges for CFS customs deployment upheld; prior conduct, res judicata and estoppel barred renewed challenge.
    Written acceptance of enhanced import value does not waive the right to challenge reassessment under customs law.
    Incomplete BIS testing cannot justify reclassification or confiscatory action; declared customs classification restored and enhanced redemption fine s...
    Grave suspicion and Section 65B compliance barred reliance on CCTV footage, sustaining discharge of accused officers.
    Anti-dumping duty on natural mica based pearl industrial pigments extended until 25 November 2026
    Anti-dumping duty on Monoisopropylamine imports from China imposed for five years to address dumping and injury
❯❯
Maximize Maximize Maximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

+

Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

NOTE:

Highlights
Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
Results Found:
Show All Summaries Hide All Summaries

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

Showing Results for :
Reset Filters
No Records Found

Highlights

Back

All Highlights

whatsapp Join Channel
Showing Results for : Reset Filters

Once the original reassessment orders u/s 148 were quashed, they...

Tax reassessment orders quashed; rectification order unsustainable due to non-existent original orders and income threshold not met.

Contents
Summary
Note

Note

-

Bookmark

Print

Print

Income Tax August 24, 2024 Case Laws HC
Once the original reassessment orders u/s 148 were quashed, they ceased to exist legally. The rectification order u/s 154 was premised on the quashed orders, which could not be revived or corrected. Section 154 could only be invoked if a valid order capable of rectification existed. Since the original orders were non-existent after being quashed, invoking Section 154 was impermissible. Additionally, the condition u/s 149(1)(b) requiring income escaping assessment to be Rs. 50 lakhs or more was not fulfilled. Consequently, the rectification order was unsustainable and quashed by the High Court.

Topics

Acts Income Tax